Uncertainty analysis at large scales: limitations and subjectivity of current practices--a water quality case study
You are viewing information about the paper Uncertainty analysis at large scales: limitations and subjectivity of current practices--a water quality case study.
|Journal:||Water Sci Technol 2007/09/28|
|Authors:||Bijlsma, R. M.;Groenendijk, P.;Blind, M. W.;Hoekstra, A. Y.|
|Address:||Department of Water Engineering & Management, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. email@example.com|
Uncertainty analysis for large-scale model studies is a challenging activity that requires a different approach to uncertainty analysis at a smaller scale. However, in river basin studies, the practice of uncertainty analysis at a large scale is mostly derived from practice at a small scale. The limitations and inherent subjectivity of some current practices and assumptions are identified, based on the results of a quantitative uncertainty analysis exploring the effects of input data and parameter uncertainty on surface water nutrient concentration. We show that: (i) although the results from small- scale sensitivity analysis are often applied at larger scales, this is not always valid; (ii) the current restriction of the uncertainty assessment to uncertainty types with a strong evidence base gives structurally conservative estimates; (iii) uncertainty due to bias is usually not assessed, but it may easily outweigh the effects of variability; (iv) the uncertainty bandwidth may increase for higher aggregation levels, although the opposite is the standard assumption.